Make vs Zapier: The Real Comparison
I’ve used both Make (formerly Integromat) and Zapier for years. Built hundreds of automations in each.
Here’s the honest breakdown of when to use which.
The Quick Summary
| Factor | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | Easier | More complex |
| Power | Good | Better |
| Pricing | Expensive | Much cheaper |
| Free tier | 100 tasks/month | 1,000 ops/month |
| Best for | Simple automations | Complex workflows |
Pricing: Make Wins Easily
This is the biggest difference.
Free Tier
Zapier: 100 tasks/month, 5 Zaps (automations) Make: 1,000 operations/month, unlimited scenarios
Make’s free tier is 10x more generous.
Paid Plans
| Plan | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $20/month (750 tasks) | $9/month (10,000 ops) |
| Mid-tier | $49/month (2,000 tasks) | $16/month (10,000 ops) |
| Pro | $99/month (unlimited) | $29/month (40,000 ops) |
Make is 3-5x cheaper at every level.
Why I switched to Make: I was paying $49/month on Zapier. Moved to Make for $9/month with MORE capacity. Same automations, lower cost.
Ease of Use: Zapier Wins
Zapier is simpler. Period.
Zapier’s approach:
- When THIS happens → Do THAT
- Linear, step-by-step
- Minimal learning curve
- Good for beginners
Make’s approach:
- Visual flowchart builder
- Multiple paths and branches
- More powerful but more complex
- Steeper learning curve
My honest take: If you’ve never built automations, start with Zapier. You can always switch to Make later. But if you’re comfortable with logic and flowcharts, Make’s visual builder is actually intuitive.
Power and Flexibility: Make Wins
Make can do things Zapier can’t (or makes difficult):
Routers and Branches
Make lets you split a workflow into multiple paths based on conditions. Zapier requires separate Zaps.
Example: When a form is submitted:
- If it’s a sales inquiry → notify sales AND add to CRM
- If it’s a support request → create ticket AND notify support
- If it’s spam → delete
In Make: One scenario with a router. In Zapier: Three separate Zaps.
Iterators (Loop Over Data)
Processing multiple items? Make handles it natively. Zapier’s loops are clunky.
Error Handling
Make shows exactly where errors occur and lets you handle them. Zapier’s error handling is basic.
Data Transformation
Make has better built-in functions for manipulating data - dates, text, arrays, JSON.
App Integrations
Zapier: 6,000+ apps Make: 1,500+ apps
Zapier has more integrations, but the gap is smaller than it looks. Make has all the major apps. You’re unlikely to hit integration issues with either.
Missing something? Both support webhooks for custom connections.
Real World Comparison
Simple automation: Email → Spreadsheet
When someone fills out my contact form:
- Add their info to a spreadsheet
- Send me a notification
Zapier: 5 minutes to set up. Simple, works perfectly. Make: 5 minutes to set up. Also simple.
Winner: Tie for simple automations.
Medium automation: CRM → Email Sequence
When a deal moves to “Proposal Sent”:
- Wait 3 days
- Check if deal status changed
- If not, send follow-up email
Zapier: Possible but requires Paths (paid feature) and delay (paid feature). Make: Built-in delays, conditions, and scheduling.
Winner: Make - more flexible and cheaper.
Complex automation: Multi-step workflow
When an order is placed:
- Check inventory
- If in stock → fulfill, update inventory, email customer
- If out of stock → notify supplier, email customer different message
- Log everything to spreadsheet
Zapier: Requires multiple Zaps, Paths, and careful coordination. Make: One scenario with routers and conditions. Clean and maintainable.
Winner: Make - significantly easier for complex workflows.
When to Use Each
Choose Zapier if:
- You’re new to automation
- Your automations are simple (trigger → action)
- You need a specific rare integration
- Your company already uses Zapier
- You value simplicity over power
Choose Make if:
- Budget matters (most people)
- You need complex workflows
- You’re comfortable with visual logic
- You process high volumes
- You want more control over data
My Personal Setup
I use Make for 90% of automations. It’s cheaper and more powerful.
I keep a Zapier free account for the occasional integration Make doesn’t have.
Migration: Zapier to Make
If you’re switching:
- List your current Zaps
- Identify equivalents in Make (most apps are covered)
- Rebuild in Make (often faster once you know the interface)
- Run both in parallel briefly
- Cancel Zapier
It took me a weekend to migrate 15 automations. Worth it for the cost savings.
The Verdict
For most people: Make
Unless you specifically need Zapier’s simplicity or a rare integration, Make gives you more power for less money.
For beginners: Zapier free tier
Learn automation basics, then graduate to Make when you hit limits or want more power.
For enterprise: Evaluate both
At enterprise scale, other factors (security, compliance, support) matter more than price. Both have enterprise offerings.
Bottom Line
Make is better for:
- Power users
- Complex workflows
- Budget-conscious users
- High volume automations
Zapier is better for:
- Beginners
- Simple automations
- Rare integrations
- Teams already invested in Zapier
For most readers, I recommend starting with Make’s free tier. 1,000 operations per month is enough to test real workflows and see if automation helps your business.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, significantly. Make's free tier includes 1,000 operations vs Zapier's 100 tasks. Paid plans are 3-5x cheaper for similar functionality. Make is the budget choice.
Make has a steeper learning curve. Zapier is simpler for basic automations. Make is more powerful for complex workflows. Beginners should start with Zapier; power users often prefer Make.
Mostly yes. Both connect to 1,500+ apps. Make has some features Zapier lacks (routers, iterators, better error handling). Zapier has some integrations Make doesn't. For most use cases, either works.